Violent early morning repo

[Richard]

Uhm, that was the point. It was NOT their property (if they didn't pay for
it) but you are saying they should have the right to own the gun (to defend
their property)? So what if they used it? To defend their property (that is
not their property)? And what if they used your logic (again) - that they
are going to kill someone with THEIR own gun, before they killed by someone
else's. 


> [Original Message]
> From: Brian Leach <bleach9 at cox.net>
> To: <central-city-discuss at gcna.info>
> Date: 8/24/2006 9:29:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Violent early morning repo
>
> Guns may have been designed to kill things (including people), but they
can 
> be carried solely for protection, and the repo man had every right to
carry 
> one.  I'd rather shoot someone with my gun than have someone shoot me
with 
> theirs, so take your choice.  The deadbeats also have the right (if they
are 
> US citiizens) to carry a gun.  Seeing how the car was being repo'ed, I
guess 
> it really isn't their property, now is it.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richard " <rjayc40 at mindspring.com>
> To: <central-city-discuss at gcna.info>
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Violent early morning repo
>
>
> > Using that same logic, then the deadbeats who didn't make their car
> > payments ALSO had the right to carry a gun (or two or fifteen). What if
> > they decided to use their gun(s) to protect their property (that they
> > didn't pay for)? Guns are designed for one purpose - to kill people.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: Brian Leach <bleach9 at cox.net>
> >> To: <central-city-discuss at gcna.info>
> >> Date: 8/24/2006 7:49:47 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Violent early morning repo
> >>
> >> In the repo man's defense, perhaps he felt threatened, making the gun a
> >> totally legitimate excuse.  Put yourself in his shoes and see if you'd
> > think
> >> it was a barrel of fun to go repo some deadbeat's car in the middle of
> > the
> >> night and be confronted by the deadbeat and several of his friends.
> >>
> >> Besides, guns are legal.  The right to own and carry one (or two, or
> >> fifteen) is protected under the Constitution.   Thank God the liberals
> >> haven't been able to change that - yet.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Note--
> > By replying to this email, you will be sending to the entire list.
> > Be sure to change the recipient of the email if you do not want to post
> > to the central-city-discuss list.
> >
> > --Disclaimer-- 
> > The messages exchanged on this list in no way reflect the official
> > position of the Greater Coronado Neighborhood association.  This e-mail
> > list is maintained by an outside source, with no financial tie, or
> > editorial directive from the Greater Coronado Neighborhood Association.
> >
> > To maintain your subscription, visit http://www.gcna.info/list
> > 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Note--
> By replying to this email, you will be sending to the entire list.
> Be sure to change the recipient of the email if you do not want to post
> to the central-city-discuss list.
>
> --Disclaimer-- 
> The messages exchanged on this list in no way reflect the official
> position of the Greater Coronado Neighborhood association.  This e-mail
> list is maintained by an outside source, with no financial tie, or
> editorial directive from the Greater Coronado Neighborhood Association. 
>
> To maintain your subscription, visit http://www.gcna.info/list